William Shakespeare s King Lear Essay - 1774 Words

William Shakespeare’s 1608 tragedy, King Lear ¸ is full to the brim with references to the gods. However, what is the real purpose of these gods within the tragedy? Some may argue the fact that certain believers triumphed over nonbelievers as the foundation of divine intervention theory. Others will argue that although many of the characters held belief in the gods, they experienced the same fate as those who never spoke a word about them, which could be an indication of a lack of divine intervention. Is King Lear trying to promote one theory over the other? It seems unlikely, as these two views are so equally prominent within the tragedy that it is difficult to argue one view as right and one view as wrong. In King Lear, the idea that the gods played a role in the fates of the characters, and the idea that it was the character s own human action which determined their fate, are two theories so notable throughout the play that it is impossible to fully support either argume nt. In this essay, I will discuss the strongest and weakest points of both views as the tragedy progresses, starting with the theory of divine intervention and ending with the theory of human fate. The theory of intervention from the gods throughout the lives of the characters in King Lear has its biggest support lying in the fact that the characters who did not recognize the gods perish . If a reader were to collect the lines of Cornwall, Goneril, and Regan, a big piece of evidence is the fact thatShow MoreRelatedWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1564 Words   |  7 PagesWilliam Shakespeare is universally known for his literary output both in poetry and drama. Whether through his laugh-invoking comedies or his heart-wrenching tragedies, Shakespeare’s plays have changed the course of literature. Many of his plays about love are widely praised by all, but Shakespeare s King Lear differs from the rest due to its definition of love. King Lear serves as an battleground between deception and compassion, between flattery and honesty. Rather than focusing on romantic loveRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1550 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION: By facilitating the growth of evil within William Shakespeare’s King Lear, it is evident that the tragedy’s protagonist, King Lear can be held accountable for his own victimization and ultimate downfall. The most notable aspects of this self-induced victimization include Lear’s own lack of practical wisdom and divergence from the natural order, combined with the neglect of kingship, that enables Lear as a tragic hero to create the conceptual framework in which the ulterior motives ofRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear3086 Words   |  13 PagesJerion Young Ms. Woods English IV 4 March 2015 King Lear William Shakespeare uses several literary elements in his writing, elements which are especially apparent in his play, King Lear. Shakespeare uses excellent creativity and description when writing this tragedy. â€Å"Neither has Shakespeare placed in the mouth of any other character in this play such fatalistic expressions as may be found in King Lear and occasionally elsewhere†(A.C. 2003). The way King Lear talks in this play is very evil compared toRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1611 Words   |  7 Pagesexperience life-changing events that jeopardize our sense of identity and make us question how we value ourselves. Our perception of our worth can change with what we learn through our existence, much like the characters in the play King Lear by William Shakespeare. Adversity and hardship are inevitable when characters are unable to connect themselves within their own identity or find a loss of self at some point in their role. The self-awareness, an essential a spect of their role, of many ofRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1320 Words   |  6 Pagesothers. Having strong communication skills allows one to better understand the situation at hand. Proper communication is essential to working out problems because of this reason. In the play King Lear by William Shakespeare, Lear communicating with his daughters, Gloucester communicating with his sons, and Lear communicating with Kent are all examples of failure of communication, which later lead to consequences and hardships that the characters must face. Without proper communication, people willRead MoreBlindness By William Shakespeare s King Lear2212 Words   |  9 PagesMaysoun Deeb Mr. A. T. Lebar EN4UN-04 13 July 2015 King Lear Blindness by definition, according to dictionaries, is â€Å"unable to see and lacking the sense of sight† by which King Lear, the classic tragic play written by William Shakespeare, illustrated the concept of blindness amongst his characters as the leading theme. King Lear and Gloucester were the characters that have been conflicted by this â€Å"blindness† that may or may not change their personalities in the very end of the play. Gloucester becomesRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1546 Words   |  7 PagesTwo Sides to Every Person There are two sides to every story; that of the protagonist and that of the antagonist. As shown in the Shakespearean play King Lear, there is very little difference between the two. Edmund, who appears to be a villain, is more than meets the eye. His evil is a rebellion against the social order that denies him legitimacy. His villainy does not come from innate cruelty but from misdirected desire for familial love. His remorse in the end displays his humanity and blindnessRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1510 Words   |  7 PagesShakespeare’s King Lear deals with tragic human relationship like the other tragedies of the author, but this story was written in social aspect and raises the doubtful point on legitimacy of some political systems. In this play, various characters form multi-layered kconflict relations. Thus, the story is being propelled towards tragedy due to numerous inner and outer conflicts of each character. However, as it is brought into being a charact er, Edgar in the end of the story, it implies new beginningRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear1470 Words   |  6 Pagesduring the Elizabethan era, making it relatable to all audiences, especially the modern audience, leaving room for multiple perspectives and understanding of the play. Shakespeare’s play ‘King Lear’, depicts the main protagonist’s ‘gradual descent into madness’ as a result of the forces of evil acting in the play for Lear has, to an extent, have sinned though it can’t outweigh that he has been sinned against. This is confirmed through Lear’s injudiciousness to see through his two eldest daughter’s internalRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s King Lear 1306 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"All...shall taste the wages of their virtue...the cup of their deservings. (5.3.317-320)† King Lear is frequently regarded as one of Shakespeare’s masterpieces, and its tragic scope touches almost all facets of the human condition: from the familial tensions between parents and children to the immoral desires of power, from the follies of pride to the false projections of glory. However, one theme rings true throughout the play, and that very theme is boundless suffering, accentuated by the gruesome

Bullying and the Holocaust Free Essays

Bullying and the Holocaust: Competition versus Cooperation When an animal is faced with starvation it often turns to cannibalism and may attack and kill a weaker animal of the same species. The German Nazis followed this system of competition versus cooperation. The Nazis felt they had no other choice to survive than to kill millions of Jews, Gypsies, and disabled people. We will write a custom essay sample on Bullying and the Holocaust or any similar topic only for you Order Now After the Holocaust, researchers uncovered many Journals kept by those who were persecuted. Here is a short exert from a fourteen year old girl: â€Å"October 27, 1937: The other girls and I were moved for the sixth time today. This time they moved us to a factory closer to Auschwitz. I’m beginning to fear that I’m at the end and I might die soon. At some points I wish they would go ahead and kill me so I wouldn’t have to endure this pain. Through all of this I still don’t understand why the Nazis hate us. We never did anything to them. I often wish someone would speak up on our behalf and save us from this terrible life. Looking back on the Holocaust people wonder xactly why no one spoke up and fought for the persecuted for so long during the war. It was like they were all students in school who pretended not to notice when someone was getting bullied so they didn’t have to get involved in it. Half of the mass slaughter of the Holocaust was due to bullying by peer pressure. People felt pressured by others to turn in Jews to Nazi official s. They wanted to save themselves and let the Jews be persecuted. As this happened more often no one even thought twice about it and had little regret that they probably Just sent omeone to their death. 2 As a part of the â€Å"Final Solution†, the Nazis did everything possible to exterminate the Jews. Through all of the hateful words, excruciating torture methods, and unreasonable forced labor, the Nazis believed that they threatened their way of life and the world would be better without them. World War II and the Holocaust officially ended on May 8, 1945, but only about two-thirds of the Jewish population remained. How to cite Bullying and the Holocaust, Papers

Organizational Change Management Change and Planned Change

Question: Describe about the Report for Organizational Change Management of Change and Planned Change. Answer: How and why do change agents need to use different skills to reduce the negative impact of political behavior during organizational change? Organizational change is a very sensitive matter that affects the performance of the employees. More or less each organization has done change in its business or in its working culture. However, managing and maintaining the change in the organization is more critical than implementing the same. Presently, in order to manage the organizational change, companies recruit the change agents, so that they can manage the changing environment and motivate the employees towards organizational goals (Senior and Swailes 2010). The main threat that an organizations get during and after implementing the change is the negative political behavior of the employees. However, the change agent of the company can handle the situation by following the Kotters eight step model: The first step of Kotters eight step model is create the urgency. In order to do this, the change agent needs to communicate the need of change clearly to the employees. This can be done by proper communication with the employees, which requires good knowledge. The change agent must be knowledgeable enough to face and answer each query of the employees (Caldwell 2003). The knowledge is also required to understand the negative political mentality of the employees so that the needful steps can be taken beforehand. The second step is form powerful coalition, which requires the leadership capability of the change agent. At the same time, the change agent needs to build strong relationship with the employees so that employees can trust the change agent. The third step is creating a vision for the organizational change. In order to do that, the change agents must have the clear vision regarding the needs of change and ways to achieve the same (Burnes 2004). The fourth step is communicating the vision to the employees. If the agents have clear vision and if they communicate the vision with the employees in a proper way then they can convey the need for the change to the employees. This helps reduce the organizational politics against the change. The fifth step is removing the obstacles. In order to remove the obstacles, the change agent must have high patient level so that right decision can be taken. The behavior of the change agent must be polite and calm. The change agent needs to deal with each employee with same priority. The relationship between the change agent and the employee must be friendly and reliable. At the same time, the change agent must provide rewards to the employees, who have performed well (Thomas and Hardy 2011). This helps to motivate the employees towards the organizational change. Apart from that, the change agent also requires the identify the employees, who are against the change an needs to take proper step to remove their resistance. The sixth step is creating the short-term wins. This can be done by implementing the sure-fire tasks that do not require the critics of organizational change. At the same time, the change agent should not take any expensive project that can be unsuccessful because of the negative political behavior of the people (Caldwell 2003). The seventh step is declaring the change slowly. In many organizations the changing process becomes failure because of the early declare of the victory. Therefore, the change agent needs to analyze the goals and the strategies to improving the change management process. The employees can use the Kaizen techniques for the improvements. The last step is guiding and mixing the change in the corporate culture. At this step, the change agent needs to communicate with the employees about the process of change at every time. At the same time, the values of change and the plan of change also need to be disclosed to the employees (Senior and Swailes 2010). The change agent of a company needs to use the different skills to manage the organizational change and the negative impact of political behavior of the employees because that helps the agent to detect the main source of negative political behavior and handle the situation in better manner (Burnes 2004). For example, if the change agent has very friendly relationship with the employees, then it becomes easier to find out the reason behind their political behavior. At the same time, it also helps the change agent to know the needs of the employees and the way in which they want to accept the change. It helps the change agent to take appropriate strategies to manage the situation. Reference list: Burnes, B. 2004. Emergent change and planned change competitors or allies?: The case of XYZ construction, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 24(9): 886 902. Caldwell, R. 2003. Models of Change Agency: a Fourfold Classification, British Journal of Management, 14: 131142 Senior, B. and Swailes, S. 2010. Organizational Change. 4th Ed, Harlow: FT Prentice Hall Thomas, R and Hardy, C. 2011. Reframing resistance to organizational change, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(3): 322-331.